Latest NFL Network News

 

Regulating Cable

The New York Times, 11/27/2007

In 1984, cable companies convinced Congress that they were mere minnows that needed to be exempted from many regulatory requirements so they could compete against the titans of broadcast television. That may have been true back then, but now cable companies are media titans, and they should be regulated. Today the Federal Communications Commission can take an important step toward that goal.

The Cable Communications Act of 1984 stipulated that if cable systems with at least 36 channels ever reached 70 percent of households, and 70 percent of those households subscribed to a cable package, the F.C.C. could set up whatever regulations were necessary to promote “diversity of information sources.”

That moment appears to have arrived. The chairman of the commission, Kevin Martin, is expected to hold a vote today on a report that finds that cable has crossed the threshold. Despite the outcry from cable carriers, the commission should accept the report.

Far more than in 1984, when broadcast television commanded the vast majority of viewers and cable penetration was low, there is a good case for energetically regulating the cable industry. Out of the regulators’ sights, the cable giants have cornered the basic cable markets, keeping competitors at bay by cutting favorable package deals with programming networks, which are sometimes part of their own conglomerate.

Click here to read the editorial.

Who offers NFL Network at no extra cost?

DirecTV verizon AT&T U-Verse
  • Make the Switch

    Switch to a TV provider that will bring you NFL Network, not hold you hostage.

  • Contact Your Government Officials

    Tell your government officials that cable companies are denying you access to NFL Network and its year-round programming including live NFL games.

    Send Your Message Now